PRIVATE SOLUTION DESIGN — not an adopted rule and not public guidance. This page is the working bridge from the completed research architecture to solution drafting. It does not replace Memo I–III. The active memorandums remain the narrative legal analysis; the C01–C46 matrix remains the mandatory stress-test; source packs remain evidence.
P1 batch — Proposal & Authorities handoff
The three active pilots are the concrete Priority 1 implementation layer of this Generalised Solution. Their detailed solution logic, user outputs, evidence packages and execution-readiness audits remain on the pilot pages above. Institutional conversion is maintained in Institutional Action — Authorities and Requests.
- P1.1 criminal record: substantive solution is complete as a private draft. Official-source verification now validates Dirección General de Gestión Migratoria as the central proposal/coordination node for immigration instructions/criteria. ES-CR-01B can remain a Real-Decreto-level evidentiary mechanism only while it preserves the substantive LO 4/2000 art.31.5 condition. Residual: exact issuing/signatory chain, exact regulatory placement and branch-specific review where not already fixed by the receiving procedure.
- P1.2 travel/return: current-law triage and the proposed three-output travel regime are structurally complete. The broad legal vehicle is now narrowed: amendment of organic LO 4/2000 art.34 for a target group outside the current statutory gate → Real Decreto development → Interior order for the document model. Residual: precise legislative addressee/submission channel and review design for the new category.
- P1.3 civil status: substantive solution is complete and institutional action remains branch-specific. Registro Civil review and the foreign-judgment exequátur/appeal branch are now verified; remaining authority/review mapping is limited principally to immigration and autonomous pareja procedures.
Rule: do not reopen the underlying Memo / Document Matrix / C01–C46 research merely to populate the institutional layer. Re-open legal research only for a genuinely missing concrete competence, legal-vehicle or procedure question.
Remaining document streams — current priority classification
Priority Batches — Document and Procedure Streams remains the document/procedure inventory for all non-P1 streams. Page titles are now aligned to their current priority: P2-*, P3-* and P4-*.
- Priority 2 — structural solution gaps: A birth/child/citizenship; B education/qualifications; C regulated professions; D POA/representation/notarial access; E transport/property/ownership; F family-link evidence.
- Priority 3 — implementation and harmonisation: G domestic identity; H reuse/document ageing; I protection/status transition/risk.
- Priority 4 — document usability infrastructure: X apostille/legalisation; translation; recognition of legal effect; deadline/subsanación. Priority 4 supports P1–P3 but remains a clearly numbered final priority for navigation and work sequencing.
Working rule: Priority 2 is where a recurring non-workable pathway may justify a Generalised Solution. Priority 3 is where the legal pathway exists but needs consistent implementation, receiving criteria or harmonisation. A document type may engage more than one Diagnostic Stream, and an individual child page may later receive an item-level priority override.
1. Two-axis architecture
Axis A — Diagnostic Streams
- Diagnostic Stream 1 (DS1) — Identity, residence documentation, travel and return → Memo I.
- Diagnostic Stream 2 (DS2) — Access to Belarusian source documents / representation / documentary impossibility → Memo II.
- Diagnostic Stream 3 (DS3) — Authentication, translation, receiving-side sufficiency and alternative evidence → Memo III.
A real-life situation may engage all three Diagnostic Streams. They identify where the chain fails; they do not determine priority and are not themselves Generalised Solutions.
Axis B — delivery streams from the Implementation Plan