Last updated: 30-Sep-2026. Salamanca, Spain
Update: The university authentication proposal now distinguishes the existing rules, the common verification mechanism and its sector-specific alternative, without changing the separate missing-transcript solution.
<aside>
Problem: the applicant has a diploma or academic certificate containing the required information, but cannot obtain the apostille required for its use in Spain's university-recognition procedure.
Existing options first: establish the exact procedure, document and legal status of the applicant. Use any applicable existing exemption or protected-status mechanism, and check whether the ordinary authentication route is genuinely inaccessible.
Proposed solution: allow the competent authority, under a properly authorised procedure, to establish the document's official origin through another controlled and sufficiently reliable verification method. Record the authentication obstacle, the checks performed, their result and any remaining doubt.
Practical result: the authentication question can be resolved so that the qualification is assessed on its merits. Authenticating the document does not itself recognise the degree, prove missing subjects or authorise professional practice.
Who should act: the ministry responsible for universities and the Secretaría General de Universidades, with MAEUEC and the relevant assessment bodies. They should identify what existing powers permit and determine the instrument needed for any unresolved step. The proposed alternative is not a universal exemption already available.
</aside>
Contents
The issue here is an existing academic document that cannot complete the required authentication procedure. It is not simply the loss of the applicant's own copy and it is not a lack of evidence about what the person studied.
Royal Decree 889/2022 distinguishes the diploma or certification of its issue in Article 13(1)(c) from the academic certificate in Article 13(1)(d). The latter supplies the programme's duration, subjects, workload and applicable credits. A document may contain all that information and still have an unresolved authentication requirement. Conversely, an authenticated diploma may prove that a qualification was awarded without establishing its detailed academic content. [1]
This is why the university authentication proposal is separate from the missing-transcript solution. One establishes official origin; the other addresses academic information that cannot be recovered from adequate official records.
Homologación, declaración de equivalencia and university recognition of completed studies are not one procedure. Their legal effects, decision-makers and professional consequences differ. This commentary principally concerns the State procedures governed by Royal Decree 889/2022; it does not create a single rule for all educational or professional applications. [1]
For the ordinary third-country procedure, Article 13 requires the degree or issuance certificate and the academic certificate to meet the prescribed legalisation or apostille conditions. Its stated exception for documents from EU Member States, the European Economic Area and Switzerland concerns their origin; a Belarusian document does not acquire that origin merely because the applicant resides in Spain. Translation remains a separate requirement. [1]
Where the Hague Convention applies, the ordinary route is an apostille from the competent authority of the issuing State. Article 3(2) permits receiving-State simplifications, but does not itself dispense with the requirement in Royal Decree 889/2022. A translation or an ordinary certified copy is not automatically an alternative authentication route. [1–2]
Article 14 provides for checks concerning the authenticity and content of documents. Those powers may clarify a doubt or confirm an existing record. They do not, by themselves, establish a general exemption from Article 13's mandatory formal conditions. A confirmation from a university therefore needs to be assessed for both what it proves and the legal function it is permitted to perform. [1]
A replacement issued by the university, its successor or an archive must be assessed on its actual contents and issuer. Obtaining a new copy does not necessarily solve an apostille obstacle that applies equally to the new document.
Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347 requires facilitation of full access to qualification-recognition procedures for beneficiaries of international protection who cannot provide documentary evidence. It also addresses assessment and recognition of prior learning and experience. Those obligations concern the persons within the Regulation's scope and do not confer automatic recognition of a qualification. They must be applied as existing obligations, not postponed until a future ordinary-applicant proposal is adopted. [3]